"Factoring a Number"


----- Original Message -----
From: Ian Clark <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:28
Subject: Re: [Jchat] APWJ Second Edition Status
To: Chat forum <[email protected]>

> Referring to the original article in Vector vol 10.4 it had no title
> beyond the series title: At Play With J.
> 
> I don't know at what stage it acquired the rider: tacit 
> definition --
> that I guess must be put down to editorial misclassification 
> based on
> the opening sentence which uses the term "tacit definition" as a
> casual example of something to make the eyes glaze over.
> 
> If the volunteer revising it can suggest a more appropriate 
> title for
> what has become Chapter 2, I should be grateful.
> 
> And yes: IMO advances in J (or desktop computers) since Gene 
> wrote the
> articles are best handled as footnotes or endnotes. But... each case
> on its merits. Volunteers: please suggest the wording of any footnote
> or endnote you think it needs.
> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Doc/Articles/Play102 illustrates how.
> 
> Ian Clark
> Subeditor, APWJ.
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Chris Burke 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Brian Schott wrote:
> >> I looked at that one too, and I agree. I have another 
> question about
> >> that article. If you look in the paragraph where Eugene 
> writes, "Tsk
> >> tsk." you will see he is suggesting that the residue function is
> >> tolerant and the fit conjunction must be used to force no 
> tolerance.>> The Tsk Tsk seems to be noting that the fit use is 
> not properly
> >> documented in the DOJ. But all of the examples give the same result
> >> even without the zero tolerance forced.
> >>
> >> j602/help/dictionary/d230.htm
> >>
> >> Am I right? The current DOJ entry for residue seems to be oriented
> >> toward augmenting residue to allow for tolerance, not removing
> >> tolerance.
> >
> > The article was written many years ago. Since then, fit for 
> residue is
> > documented, and we have extended integers and q: . I suggest 
> documenting> the new stuff in footnotes, see
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Doc/Articles/Play171 , and 
> perhaps Ian
> > can make any editorial changes in content.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to