[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I create the wiki page <http://www.0x50.org/wiki/index.php? > title=Comparison_servers> for comparing light webservers (cherokee, > lighttpd, nanoweb, thttpd, etc). I would like to compare all of > light web servers and conclude that cherokee is the "best" ;-) > > [..] > > I think that this is an opportunity for underlying the best features > of cherokee (like reescalation and plugins architechture (and ia > plugin!!)). > > What do you think?
I have mixed feeling about this idea. On the one hand, it's something interesting and informative which we should show proactively. It will expose what is really the value of Cherokee, and it would help us to increase our critical mass. On the other hand, I don't know if the Cherokee Wiki is the best place for it. Even if we try hard to make the comparison as fair as possible, there will be people wondering if it is just some kind of advertising. It would also be difficult to keep it neutral, I wouldn't like to touch some stories about some of those server which eventually may hurt some feeling. So, I don't know.. It is indeed a good idea, but I'm not sure about the political side. I'd love to listen other people opinions on it :-) -- Greetings, alo. http://www.alobbs.com _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://www.alobbs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
