John Hampton wrote: > [1] I personally think that both apache and lighttpd's > configurations suck and that is a big reason why I like Cherokee.
See? Do you see want I mean? It's really tough to be impartial! LOL! ;-) Seriously, there are point in which Cherokee is better, like the configuration or the source code, which are very difficult to measure. -- Greetings, alo. http://www.alobbs.com _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://www.alobbs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
