On Thursday 09 February 2006 15:40, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I create the wiki page <http://www.0x50.org/wiki/index.php? > > title=Comparison_servers> for comparing light webservers (cherokee, > > lighttpd, nanoweb, thttpd, etc). I would like to compare all of > > light web servers and conclude that cherokee is the "best" ;-) > > > > [..] > > > > I think that this is an opportunity for underlying the best features > > of cherokee (like reescalation and plugins architechture (and ia > > plugin!!)). > > > > What do you think? > > I have mixed feeling about this idea. > > On the one hand, it's something interesting and informative which we > should show proactively. It will expose what is really the value of > Cherokee, and it would help us to increase our critical mass.
This is the initial intention > > On the other hand, I don't know if the Cherokee Wiki is the best > place for it. Where is it?. > Even if we try hard to make the comparison as fair as > possible, there will be people wondering if it is just some kind of > advertising. It would also be difficult to keep it neutral, I > wouldn't like to touch some stories about some of those server which > eventually may hurt some feeling. Well, at least my intention is not to hurt anybody. I just thinked that for complete _objective_ information about servers. I think that all we could justify objectively could be in wiki, the rest could'nt. In what stories do you refer?. Perhaps I misunderstand you. > > So, I don't know.. > > It is indeed a good idea, but I'm not sure about the political side. > I'd love to listen other people opinions on it :-) Decide what you decide, notice me. Thanks, Xan. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://www.alobbs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
