There is a level of automation that leads a person through the potential issues
other than failure to function unless some unknown steps are used to resolve
the issue. IMHO.
Ray C. Horn
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email is CONFIDENTIAL and intended only for those
to whom this email has been sent by the original sender. You may
purchase the rights to redistribute this email by clicking here.
> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:38:17 +0200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cannot start Cherokee 0.99.23
>
> ray horn wrote:
> > Why can this not be made part of the installation process ?
> > I mean if Cherokee fails to run unless the required changes are made
> > then why not simply make this automatic ?!?
> >
> > Or what am I missing here ?
> If the config is changed automatically, the server might work, but
> probably not as you would think.
> Silently failing is much worse than ringing all the bells and whistles,
> in my opinion. At least this way you can debug from the beginning.
>
> Just my two cents ;-)
>
> --
> [email protected]
> http://unixwars.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
