Okay but in my case I was using Cherokee as a way to get to the Admin so when
Cherokee fails I cannot Admin unless I by-pass Cherokee.
And my original assertion holds. May the Admin smart enough to deal with the
way Cherokee wants to work otherwise people like me may not be smart enough to
fix their setup and they may conclude Cherokee simply does not work anymore as
I have until this problem gets a resolution.
Gentlemen, I too write software for a living however were I to make the kind of
change that must have been made to Cherokee I would have crafted a slicker
solution to enable those who may be faces with failure of Cherokee to function
with a happier alternative.
So far I have not heard anyone give me anything I can use to resolve my
issue...
If you want to make changes to the way Cherokee works then please give us a
nice slick smart way to go with the flow - this should be pretty easy to do,
well easier for you to do than for me to play guessing games with how to make
Cherokee 0.99.23 come back to life.
Ray C. Horn
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email is CONFIDENTIAL and intended only for those
to whom this email has been sent by the original sender. You may
purchase the rights to redistribute this email by clicking here.
> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:55:42 +0200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cannot start Cherokee 0.99.23
>
> I agree, but the way I see it Cherokee-Admin is the only encouraged way
> to deal with the configuration of the server.
> Diverting resources to provide alternative methods (i.e. an interactive
> script) isn't how I would proceed in this case, but that is just a
> matter of personal choice. At least in this case, where the substitute
> plugin is much more capable than the old one.
>
> What Alvaro said about screening the config file for references to
> 'mirror' and issuing a warning seems more than enough for me. But hey,
> if the packagers think otherwise and have the time to spare, who am I to
> object? :)
>
> Cheers.
>
> Btw: did you solve the problem already? I didn't see references to
> 'mirror' on the file you posted, so I'm guessing you've changed it by now.
>
> ray horn wrote:
> > There is a level of automation that leads a person through the
> > potential issues other than failure to function unless some unknown
> > steps are used to resolve the issue. IMHO.
> --
> [email protected]
> http://unixwars.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
