On 29-ago-09, at 20:01, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I'd really prefer sticking to 0.99.20 as it seems to me to be way > more solid than newer versions.
That'd be a mistake. Even though we might eventually introduce some regression, in the last year each new Cherokee release has been much better than its predecesor. And I'm not talking about features here, I'm speaking about stability, documentation, usability fixes, etc. New features have been the exception. At this second, the most stable Cherokee version is 0.99.23+1 (trunk). Sticking to 0.99.20 would imply to give up on a number of fixes and improvements. Your beloved users do not deserve that. > So, to make it short: Should I continue to package Cherokee? Or would > you consider better for Cherokee's current development stage to be > available straight from you? I have no doubt what so ever, you definitely should. You've done a great job so far and there's no reason to stop packaging the server. Obviously the development cycles of Debian and Cherokee don't match, but that should not be any sort of show-stopper.. -- Octality http://www.octality.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
