I agree, but the way I see it Cherokee-Admin is the only encouraged way to deal with the configuration of the server. Diverting resources to provide alternative methods (i.e. an interactive script) isn't how I would proceed in this case, but that is just a matter of personal choice. At least in this case, where the substitute plugin is much more capable than the old one.
What Alvaro said about screening the config file for references to 'mirror' and issuing a warning seems more than enough for me. But hey, if the packagers think otherwise and have the time to spare, who am I to object? :) Cheers. Btw: did you solve the problem already? I didn't see references to 'mirror' on the file you posted, so I'm guessing you've changed it by now. ray horn wrote: > There is a level of automation that leads a person through the > potential issues other than failure to function unless some unknown > steps are used to resolve the issue. IMHO. -- [email protected] http://unixwars.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
