On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Tony Zakula <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the heart of the issue is that there was money invested in another > option that did not work out. If it had worked out, this discussion would > not be taking place. While providing a solution may help Cherokee grow, it > may not either. Unfortunately, besides someone being passionate about > this piece, the only other motivator is money. If the other option is > Apache, and people do not see the benefit of a better solution, then settle > for it. There are other commercial options out there, but they cost money > too. :-) > Since Octality provides commercial support for Cherokee, I can imagine Alvaro being interested in providing a feature that would grow the Cherokee userbase so much, especially with more-funded companies like we're discussing in this thread.
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
