On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Chris G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From my knowledge, In HTML a form used for login is a HTML form. > Webkit will understand and process a form regardless it is used for > login or for anything else. I accept your expertise on this and ask > for your comments! Do you have any documentation or a list of demos > of all the different login methods on the web?
I didn't mean that they were different HTML (although they can be), but rather that users perceive them as having different functions. Secondly Peter states: "It's less intuitive and requires users to > change their focus from the page content to the browser chrome." > Actually, the login page is usually the first page of a site a user > sees. If they are a member they probably have the site bookmarked. This is an example of when I said that I think you're solving problems of your own usage, but not necessarily everyone's. For example, in my personal usage, I'm logged into several dozen sites, none of which I have bookmarked. I can visit them using inline autocomplete in the omnibox, or the Most Visited section of the New Tab page. As such I'm not necessarily looking at something-like-bookmarks on navigating to these. Do > you see any issues with my idea to long-click on the star button? Click-and-hold is not a meaningful metaphor in Windows. It happens to work on the session history button, but more discoverable is that you can context-click that button -- and even that is a bit unusual, and according to our feedback, undiscoverable. PK --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
