Similarly , we could add a standard keyboard shortcut for open in a new
foreground tab, e.g. shift+click opens in a new foreground tab.

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Adam Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> == Overview ==
>
> We should add a "Open link in foreground tab" menu item to the context
> menu for hyperlinks.
>
> == Use Cases ==
>
> There are two main use cases for opening a link in a new tab:
>
> 1) Breath-first: You're viewing the Digg home page and you'd like to
> open up a number of articles to read.  This use case is well-served by
> opening links in background tabs (the current behavior).  This use
> case treats the tab strip as a queue of pages to read.
>
> 2) Depth-first: You're reading a Wikipedia article and you come across
> a link that interests you, but you know you'll later want to read the
> rest of the Wikipedia article.  This use case is well-served by
> opening links in foreground tabs.  This use case treats the tab strip
> as a stack of pages to return to.
>
> Another common variation on the depth-first use case is comparison
> shopping.  Imagine a page listing a number of similar products, such
> as refrigerators.  You select a mid-range model, read the information,
> and return to the product list to view information about a higher-end
> model.
>
> == Existing Behavior ==
>
> Currently, we do not offer to ability to open links in new foreground
> tabs.  To support the depth-first use case, the user can either open a
> background tab and then activate the tab or use the back button to
> return to an earlier page.  Opening links in background tabs and then
> activating the tab is slow and irritating because it requires the user
> to shift their focus to the tab strip and hunt down the newly opened
> tab.
>
> The user can use the back button to perform a depth-first traversal,
> but the back button gives the user no visual reminder that there is a
> page to return to.  For example, in exploring Wikipedia, the user
> could easily forget to return to an earlier article on refrigeration.
> Additionally, the comparison shopping use case is poorly supported by
> the back button.  Compare these two flows:
>
> Back button:
> 1) View product list
> 2) Click mid-range product description
> 3) Read description
> 4) Click "Back"
> 5) Click high-end product description
> 6) Click "Back"
> 7) Remember which mid-range model was viewed in step (2)
> 8) Remember which high-end model was viewed in step (5)
> 9) Open mid-range model in background tab
> 10) Open high-end model in background tab
> 11) Compare models
>
> Foreground tabs:
> 1) View product list
> 2) Open mid-range product description in new foreground tab
> 3) Read description
> 4) Activate product list tab
> 5) Open high-end product description in new foreground tab
> 6) Read description
> 7) Compare models
>
> Notice that the gap in complexity between these two flows grows as the
> user compares more models because the user has to remember which
> models he or she has already compared.  In the foreground tab flow,
> the tab strip maintains this state for the user.  (Visited hyperlink
> coloring address the memory issues to some extent, but only the first
> time the user views these items.)
>
> Creating new windows is an alternative flow for this use case, but
> then the user is forced to use the Window's task bar to manage the
> tabs and the experience becomes unmanageable if the user wishes to
> compare more than a handful of items.
>
> == Proposal ==
>
> Other browsers offer users an option to open all new tabs in
> foreground windows.  This forces users to make a global choice between
> the breadth-first and the depth-first use cases.  Instead of offering
> users a global choice, we should add a menu item to "Open link in new
> foreground tab" to the hyperlink context menu.  The menu would then
> look as follows:
>
> Open link in new background tab
> Open link in new foreground tab
> Open link in new window
> Open link in new incognito window
> Save link as...
> Copy link address
> Copy
> ---------------
> Inspect element
>
> This has the cost of increasing the complexity of the context menu.
> However, I believe the benefit of supporting the depth-first use case
> outweighs this cost.
>
> Adam
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Chromium-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to