Based on all the discussions I've had offline about the use of SVG on the web, I think it's fine to defer these tests.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 17:50, Eric Seidel <[email protected]> wrote: > I think focal points are actually just syntactic sugar, and that we could > implement them if we wanted to in PlatformGradientSkia.cpp ourselves by > doing some fancy modifications to the gradient data we passed off to Skia. > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/pservers.html#RadialGradients > > But the web doesn't use SVG, especially radial gradients in SVG. :) > > So lets not worry about it. We have much more important SVG bugs we could > fix (like proper invalidation when scrolling). :) > > -eric > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Nicolas Sylvain <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Scott Violet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Those are easy. If the test never worked them DEFER. >> >> >> Cool, a bunch of them (like the ones I originally picked) seem to be >> failing because skia does not support some features. I've seen at least 6 >> that are caused by Skia not implementing "offset focal point for gradient". >> >> Nicolas >> >> >>> >>> >>> -Scott >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Ricardo Vargas <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > At least the tests that I've been following have never worked. >>> > >>> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Peter Kasting <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Scott Violet <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> We're talking about 20 tests here. >>> >> >>> >> I vote for not regressing from 1.0 on these. >>> >> PK >>> >> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
