On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Brett Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Nicolas Sylvain <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Stephen White <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > >> > >> I'm in the process of updating chromium to use tip-of-tree skia, and in > >> the same CL, moving skia to a third_party directory, > >> retrieved via DEPS. What this means for you: > > > > Hi, > > Why do you want to move it to third party? > > The other projects developed at google that we fetch through DEPS like > > googleurl, breakpad, gtests and courgette are all living in src, not > > third_party.. > > Nicolas > > If our repo is not the canonical representation, they should all be in > thierd party. So I think that all your examples are in the wrong > place. > > Brett > src/courgette is the canonical representation. we placed googleurl, breakpad, and v8 in src and not third_party because they are developed by our team, so we do not have licensing / copyright concerns. the rule we have been following is to put items in third_party that do not conform to our licensing or that are developed by another group. i think by this measure it is correct for googleurl, breakpad, and v8 to live in src. same goes for gtest. skia seems like a borderline case to me. the point of third_party is to make ease the job of a licensing lawyer who has to figure out what they need to worry about. -darin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
