On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Avi Drissman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Evan Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Distributing binaries on Linux = sadness, as the Flash guys will tell >> you. >> [...] >> >> In summary, all I offer you is more problems and the plea that we >> should really really deter people from doing this kind of thing. I >> imagine a dystopian future where we have a per-extension appsupport >> matrix on the install page ("Works on x86-based ChromeOS but not >> arm-based ChromeOS" or whatever). >> > > As much as I agree with everything you've said, I think the ship has > already sailed on this. We're already allowing binaries in extensions. Now > we have to figure out how to mitigate the pain. > I think we can wait to see what percentage of extensions actually include binaries before devoting too much time to this. Our expectation is that this will be a very small percentage, right? Ojan > Avi > > -- > Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] > View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: > http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev > -- Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
