The goal is to expose all this through Pepper. On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Jeremy Orlow <[email protected]> wrote:
> Much of what can't be done on the web platform also can't be done inside > the NaCl sandbox. > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:49 PM, John Abd-El-Malek <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> NaCl is the answer to all these problems... >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jeremy Orlow <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Or reject extensions that could be written without a NPAPI component. >>> *ducks* >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Peter Kasting <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Avi Drissman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Q: Can't we have the extensions gallery warn that it won't work? >>>>> A: Sorry, we can't do that in an automated fashion. The extensions >>>>> author should mention it. Too bad they don't. >>>>> >>>> >>>> But we explicitly review patches with binary components. I can't see >>>> how it could be impossible for us to also mark them as "Win-only". >>>> >>>> PK >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] >>>> View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] >>> View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: >>> http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev >>> >> >> > -- Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
