On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Avi Drissman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Ojan Vafai <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think we can wait to see what percentage of extensions actually include >> binaries before devoting too much time to this. Our expectation is that this >> will be a very small percentage, right? >> > > If we give people the capabilities, people will use them. I see that we > would *like* for this to be a very small percentage, but I don't see why > that would cause it to be so. NPAPI is a _massive_ pain to deal with especially compared to the ease of use of building a webby extension. Authors will probably tend towards using NPAPI for extensions only when they really really have to, so if we can ensure that the APIs for extensions are powerful enough for what extensions want to be able to do the problem should mostly take care of itself. - James > > Avi > > -- > Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] > View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: > http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev > -- Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
