Hi Afshin,

Well, this conversation got a little out of control, but I'd just like to chip 
in to explain that setting share options via the filesystem is for me one of 
the major benefits of ZFS.

I configure both NFS and CIFS sharing via the ZFS commands, setting share 
names, read & write access, & configuring root access.  The advantage of doing 
it that way is that all the settings are a property of the pool.  It means my 
settings are protected almost as well as my data, and both disaster recovery 
and maintenance are a piece of cake.

I've already tested disaster recovery by doing a send/receive to a second 
server and bringing the pool online.  Those two simple steps were enough to 
recover all my data, permissions, and shares.  The only extra step I'd have 
needed for a true recovery would have been to rename the server.

Ross

PS.  I'm with the Sun guys about the rest of this thread.  Setting up 
authentication is not exactly hard and Microsoft themselves disable guest 
access.  I'm happily using CIFS on my home network with Windows and Linux 
clients, and a girlfriend who hasn't a clue about authentication using it with 
no problems.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

Reply via email to