Afshin Salek wrote: > I think this is a server property in nature but perhaps it should be > implemented as a share property to minimize the security implications. > > If something is a CIFS service/server property it means it's something > that doesn't concern shares and should be applied regardless.
And anonymous access doesn't seem like one of them. Seems like I should be able to choose based on the sensitivity of my data. _______________________________________________ cifs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
