Afshin Salek wrote:
> Hi Ross,
> 
> I think there's a misunderstanding about the question that I brought up.
> I don't have any problems with setting share properties via zfs and it's
> a reasonable thing to do because you're sharing out a file system.
> 
> The reason that I asked the question was that in my view
> enabling/disabling guest access is a CIFS service property
> and not a share property, although it could be implemented
> as a share property.

Does that mean you think that, if implemented, it should apply to
*all* CIFS shares, instead of applying to only a particular CIFS
share?

What does it mean to be a "CIFS service property" instead of a
"share property"?

_______________________________________________
cifs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss

Reply via email to