I think this is a server property in nature but perhaps it should be implemented as a share property to minimize the security implications.
If something is a CIFS service/server property it means it's something that doesn't concern shares and should be applied regardless. You can see examples of such properties like this: # sharectl get smb Afshin Bill Shannon wrote: > Afshin Salek wrote: >> Hi Ross, >> >> I think there's a misunderstanding about the question that I brought up. >> I don't have any problems with setting share properties via zfs and it's >> a reasonable thing to do because you're sharing out a file system. >> >> The reason that I asked the question was that in my view >> enabling/disabling guest access is a CIFS service property >> and not a share property, although it could be implemented >> as a share property. > > Does that mean you think that, if implemented, it should apply to > *all* CIFS shares, instead of applying to only a particular CIFS > share? > > What does it mean to be a "CIFS service property" instead of a > "share property"? > _______________________________________________ cifs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-discuss
