cifs-protocol  

Messages by Date

• 2009/09/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] Bitfields in the WSPP docs Hongwei Sun
• 2009/09/13 [cifs-protocol] Bitfields in the WSPP docs Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/09/11 Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
• 2009/09/11 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
• 2009/09/11 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
• 2009/09/11 Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• 2009/09/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/09/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
• 2009/09/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
• 2009/09/08 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Hongwei Sun
• 2009/09/08 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/09/08 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Hongwei Sun
• 2009/09/03 Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs/ SPN not accepted in certain scenarios Edgar Olougouna
• 2009/09/02 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/09/02 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Hongwei Sun
• 2009/09/02 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Hongwei Sun
• 2009/09/02 Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Jeremy Allison
• 2009/09/01 Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Sebastian Canevari
• 2009/08/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Matthieu Patou
• 2009/08/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Sebastian Canevari
• 2009/08/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] erroneous references to little-endian Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs/ SPN not accepted in certain scenarios Edgar Olougouna
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] cifs/ SPN not accepted in certain scenarios Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• 2009/08/28 [cifs-protocol] cifs/ SPN not accepted in certain scenarios Zachary Loafman
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
• 2009/08/26 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/26 Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Sebastian Canevari
• 2009/08/26 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/26 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/25 Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• 2009/08/25 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/25 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/25 Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/25 Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Matthieu Patou
• 2009/08/25 Re: [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/25 [cifs-protocol] MS-NRPC: AES Schannel problems Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• 2009/08/25 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/25 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/24 Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Sebastian Canevari
• 2009/08/24 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/24 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/24 Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Matthieu Patou
• 2009/08/24 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/24 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Jeremy Allison
• 2009/08/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/19 Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/19 Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Sebastian Canevari
• 2009/08/18 Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Jeremy Allison
• 2009/08/18 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/18 [cifs-protocol] Status: CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/18 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
• 2009/08/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/08/16 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
• 2009/08/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Matthieu Patou
• 2009/08/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Sebastian Canevari
• 2009/08/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/12 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status of [MS-RAIW]? Sebastian Canevari
• 2009/08/12 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status of [MS-RAIW]? Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• 2009/08/12 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/12 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/08/11 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/11 Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/11 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/11 Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/08/11 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/08/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Jeremy Allison
• 2009/08/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] erroneous references to little-endian Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] erroneous references to little-endian Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/10 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/08 Re: [cifs-protocol] Explain not standard behaviour of Windows 2003 server Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/07 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status of [MS-RAIW]? Sebastian Canevari
• 2009/08/06 [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/06 Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Edgar Olougouna
• 2009/08/05 Re: [cifs-protocol] Excel timestamp client side-caching request Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/05 Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/05 [cifs-protocol] SRX090805600011 : [MS-ADTS] 5.1.3.2.1 Control Access Rights Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/05 Re: [cifs-protocol] More information needed about Control Access Rights im MS-ADTS Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/05 [cifs-protocol] More information needed about Control Access Rights im MS-ADTS Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/08/04 Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Matthieu Patou
• 2009/08/04 Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/04 Re: [cifs-protocol] Inability to use Win2k8 as a member server in Samba4 domain (was Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response) Sebastian Canevari
• 2009/08/04 Re: [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/08/04 Re: [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/04 [cifs-protocol] Question about owner and group defaulting rules in MS-ADTS Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/08/03 Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Edgar Olougouna
• 2009/08/03 Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/03 Re: [cifs-protocol] How to determine if an account should use AES? Bill Wesse
• 2009/08/03 Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/08/01 Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Hongwei Sun
• 2009/08/01 Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Matthieu Patou
• 2009/07/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Edgar Olougouna
• 2009/07/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
• 2009/07/31 Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/07/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] Status of [MS-RAIW]? Sebastian Canevari
• 2009/07/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Edgar Olougouna
• 2009/07/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
• 2009/07/30 [cifs-protocol] Status of [MS-RAIW]? Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• 2009/07/29 Re: [cifs-protocol] Inability to use Win2k8 as a member server in Samba4 domain (was Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response) Hongwei Sun
• 2009/07/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] Inability to use Win2k8 as a member server in Samba4 domain (was Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] Inability to use Win2k8 as a member server in Samba4 domain (was Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response) Sebastian Canevari
• 2009/07/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/07/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/07/28 Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/07/27 [cifs-protocol] Inability to use Win2k8 as a member server in Samba4 domain (was Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response) Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/07/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/07/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090727600015) Bill Wesse
• 2009/07/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/07/27 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/24 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
• 2009/07/24 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC (SRX090713600128) Bill Wesse
• 2009/07/23 Re: [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/22 Re: [cifs-protocol] How does constrained delegation work? Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/22 Re: [cifs-protocol] How does constrained delegation work? Hongwei Sun
• 2009/07/21 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers (SRX090713600122) Bill Wesse
• 2009/07/20 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/20 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Bill Wesse
• 2009/07/20 [cifs-protocol] Clarify reserved bytes that are in fact used in LogonSamLogonEx response Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/20 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/20 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] How does constrained delegation work? Dominic Salemno
• 2009/07/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Dominic Salemno
• 2009/07/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Bill Wesse
• 2009/07/17 [cifs-protocol] Information needed about security token default ACL Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/07/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers Bill Wesse
• 2009/07/17 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers tridge
• 2009/07/16 [cifs-protocol] How does constrained delegation work? Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/07/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• 2009/07/15 Re: [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers tridge
• 2009/07/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC Hongwei Sun
• 2009/07/14 Re: [cifs-protocol] How is a krb5 request to cifs/my.realm handled? Richard Guthrie
• 2009/07/10 [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/07/10 [cifs-protocol] RE: Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Obaid Farooqi
• 2009/07/10 [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Richard Guthrie
• 2009/07/10 [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Edgar Olougouna
• 2009/07/10 [cifs-protocol] Help regarding the security descriptor creation algorithms Nadezhda Ivanova
• 2009/07/10 [cifs-protocol] RE: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC Bill Wesse
• 2009/07/09 Re: [cifs-protocol] Re: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Stefan (metze) Metzmacher
• 2009/07/09 RE: [cifs-protocol] Re: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Neil B Martin (MountD)
• 2009/07/08 [cifs-protocol] RE: Please clarify LSA and OsVersion behaviour in MS-NRPC John Dunning
• 2009/07/07 [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Edgar Olougouna
• 2009/07/06 [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 Edgar Olougouna
• 2009/07/06 [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - SMB2 Write and Read in Windows 7 John Dunning
• 2009/07/02 [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - ldap display specifiers Bill Wesse
• 2009/07/02 [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - ldap display specifiers Hongwei Sun
• 2009/07/02 [cifs-protocol] CAR - ldap display specifiers tridge
• 2009/06/30 [cifs-protocol] Monthly Message from the Technical Committee Ron Schnell
• 2009/06/30 RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: How is a krb5 request to cifs/my.realm handled? Richard Guthrie
• 2009/06/30 Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: How is a krb5 request to cifs/my.realm handled? Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/06/28 [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/06/26 [cifs-protocol] Resend: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian (SRX090617600092) Bill Wesse
• 2009/06/23 [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian (SRX090617600092) Bill Wesse
• 2009/06/19 [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Richard Guthrie
• 2009/06/18 [cifs-protocol] RE: how are unique attributes determined? tridge
• 2009/06/17 [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian (SRX090617600092) Bill Wesse
• 2009/06/17 [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian Steve French
• 2009/06/16 [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Richard Guthrie
• 2009/06/12 [cifs-protocol] RE: how are unique attributes determined? Edgar Olougouna
• 2009/06/05 [cifs-protocol] [MS-SMB2] Error in SMB2 Netprot description. SRX090604600250, SRX090604600324, SRX090604600333 Bill Wesse
• 2009/06/04 [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. (SRX090604600250) Bill Wesse
• 2009/06/04 [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Bill Wesse
• 2009/06/04 [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Hongwei Sun
• 2009/06/04 RE: [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Hongwei Sun
• 2009/06/04 [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Jeremy Allison
• 2009/06/04 [cifs-protocol] Re: [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Jeremy Allison
• 2009/06/04 [cifs-protocol] [Pfif] CAR: Error in SMB2 Netprot description. Jeremy Allison
• 2009/06/01 [cifs-protocol] RE: how are unique attributes determined? Edgar Olougouna
• 2009/06/01 [cifs-protocol] RE: how are unique attributes determined? Tom Jebo
• 2009/05/31 [cifs-protocol] CAR: how are unique attributes determined? tridge
• 2009/05/29 [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Richard Guthrie
• 2009/05/29 [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian [MS-ADTS]: SRX090529600007 Bill Wesse
• 2009/05/28 [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/05/28 [cifs-protocol] RE: erroneous references to little-endian Richard Guthrie
• 2009/05/20 [cifs-protocol] RE: Can an AD server have more than one domain? Andrew Bartlett
• 2009/05/20 [cifs-protocol] RE: Can an AD server have more than one domain? Sebastian Canevari

• Earlier messages
• Later messages