On 04/01/2008, at 8:02 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote: > On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 04:40:11PM +0800, Dracul wrote: >> interface FastEthernet0/14 >> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q >> switchport trunk native vlan 100 >> switchport mode trunk >> switchport nonegotiate >> end >> >> There are two VLANs used in the network VLAN 1 and VLAN 100. what >> we are >> looking at is the VLAN 100 > > So you're trying to put the Amino STB in VLAN 100? Try this instead: > > interface FastEthernet0/14 > switchport mode access > switchport access vlan 100 > spanning-tree portfast > > At the moment you've got it configured as a trunk port, with non- > tagged frames > being put in vlan 100. Whilst this shouldn't cause a problem, you > can simplify > it by configuring it as an access port instead. > > Simon
I was about to ask if he could get away with running it as an access port, but he spcifically mentioned trunking, so I was of the impression that he needed both VLANs trunked to the box. Otherwise yes, if he needs it *only* in VLAN 100, setting it up as a trunk port will do. But my guess is theres another reason that a second VLAN is neccessary, e.g. Internet access which is provided via a seperate VLAN. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
