On 04/01/2008, at 8:09 PM, Tom Storey wrote: > > On 04/01/2008, at 8:02 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote: > >> On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 04:40:11PM +0800, Dracul wrote: >>> interface FastEthernet0/14 >>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q >>> switchport trunk native vlan 100 >>> switchport mode trunk >>> switchport nonegotiate >>> end >>> >>> There are two VLANs used in the network VLAN 1 and VLAN 100. what >>> we are >>> looking at is the VLAN 100 >> >> So you're trying to put the Amino STB in VLAN 100? Try this instead: >> >> interface FastEthernet0/14 >> switchport mode access >> switchport access vlan 100 >> spanning-tree portfast >> >> At the moment you've got it configured as a trunk port, with non- >> tagged frames >> being put in vlan 100. Whilst this shouldn't cause a problem, you >> can simplify >> it by configuring it as an access port instead. >> >> Simon > > I was about to ask if he could get away with running it as an access > port, but he spcifically mentioned trunking, so I was of the > impression that he needed both VLANs trunked to the box. > > Otherwise yes, if he needs it *only* in VLAN 100, setting it up as a > trunk port will do. But my guess is theres another reason that a > second VLAN is neccessary, e.g. Internet access which is provided via > a seperate VLAN.
Access port, not trunk port. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
