Can you give an example for configuring a second tag (qinq) ? I know this sounds like a stupid question, but it kind'a sounds like you don't have to set a default tag for the native vlan on the box - that was the only way cisco sais it can be done, or wasn't I looking hard enough ?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Saku Ytti Sent: 14 ianuarie 2008 22:44 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6748 compatibility with the 7600/RSP720 series. On (2008-01-14 20:21 +0100), Peter Rathlev wrote: > The WS-X6748-GE-TX is a LAN card, so you can't really compare it to > SPAs. If you need more advanced features than just switching (and what > the PFC gives you), and still need to port density, you should look at > the Ethernet Services modules instead, like ES20-GE3C. It gives you 20 > GigabitEthernet ports (SFP) and PXF processing. Just small tip that might surprise SIP/SPA folks, ES20 does not, at this time support VLAN local significance in subinterfaces, when using single tags. this is no go int giga1/0/1.42 encap dot1q 42 int giga1/0/2.42 encpp dot1q 42 Add 2nd (Qinq) tag to the interfaces, and it works. You can workaround this to some level by using EVC config and unique SVI's, but you lose some features with SVI, such as only MQC match supported today is CoS. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
