Paul Stewart <> wrote on Tuesday, February 12, 2008 4:11 PM:
> In other words, is there any reason a Sup2/6500 can't be used on as a
> P router itself - I understand that there is more "requirements" for
> a PE router and thinking about 7206VXR's on the PE portion (which we
> may have some extras at some point in the future). Just trying to
> find a way to use what we have (Sup2/6500, GSR with Engine 0 cards,
> 7206VXR with NPE-1G and 2G).
Sup2 can't do any label operations (swap/push/pop), so this rules Sup2
out (you would need OSM or Flexwans). GSRs/E0 and 7200 do MPLS just fine
with similar performance as regular IP.
> Trying to avoid sup720 and SIP card
> deployments in this year's budget if I can but get MPLS running (in a
> general sense).
You want to look into Sup720 or Sup32 for the 6500s, but using 7200 or
GSRs is fine.
oli
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
