Hehe. Yes, I say that it's possible. I was trying it in lab's environment but I didn't hear about any real implementation of 6500/Sup2 as P-router (without OSM and Flexwan) in a real networks. Sup2 is very old and it has many restrictions. I think that using of Sup2 for SP tasks won't be cost-effective nowadays :)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Pavel Baleshenko'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 11:12 PM Subject: RE: [c-nsp] MPLS Confusion ;) > So just to rehash this (sorry)... you are saying that a 6500/Sup2 can act > as > a P router but not sure if anyone has actually done it? ;) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavel Baleshenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:02 PM > To: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer); Paul Stewart; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS Confusion ;) > > Hi. > > 6500/Sup2 can act as a P-router really. > You need IOS 12.2SXF (probably you'll need add memory and flash). It can > swap labels and be only P-router (not PE) with nor OSM nor Flexwan. > But I don't know about any implementation of 6500/Sup2 as P-router. > > Best regards > Pavel > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
