I wouldnt say so, because of this command: switchport
What would have been a layer 3 port has now become a layer 2 port, hence switchport. Thats a guess. Someone may correct or confirm my suspicion. On 08/04/2008, at 10:18 PM, Alex A. Pavlenko wrote: > Colleagues, > > is it possible to combine both SVI(for ip routing) and > subinterface(for > EoMPLS) upon common > interface configured as a trunk on 67xx LAN card? > In other words is following configuration ok? > > interface GigabitEthernet1/1 > switchport > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > switchport mode trunk > switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20 > > interface GigabitEthernet1/1.20 > encapsulation dot1Q 20 > xconnect 1.2.3.4 1 encapsulation mpls > > interface Vlan 10 > ip address 4.3.2.1 255.0.0.0 > > Thanks. > > -- > Alex. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
