This is called MUX-UNI and works fine, you need SR or SXH. David
On 4/8/08, Tom Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wouldnt say so, because of this command: > > switchport > > What would have been a layer 3 port has now become a layer 2 port, > hence switchport. > > Thats a guess. Someone may correct or confirm my suspicion. > > > On 08/04/2008, at 10:18 PM, Alex A. Pavlenko wrote: > > > Colleagues, > > > > is it possible to combine both SVI(for ip routing) and > > subinterface(for > > EoMPLS) upon common > > interface configured as a trunk on 67xx LAN card? > > In other words is following configuration ok? > > > > interface GigabitEthernet1/1 > > switchport > > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q > > switchport mode trunk > > switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20 > > > > interface GigabitEthernet1/1.20 > > encapsulation dot1Q 20 > > xconnect 1.2.3.4 1 encapsulation mpls > > > > interface Vlan 10 > > ip address 4.3.2.1 255.0.0.0 > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > Alex. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
