We're using both in/out policies without any problem on G1/G2 7200s. It all depends on the QoS actions inside the policy-map.
But i don't know if 12.2SB is officially supported for NPE300 based 7200s. -- Tassos Andrey Kostin wrote on 10/4/2008 5:11 μμ: > Hello, > > Mentioned document states about applying service-policy command to > virtual-template interface: > "This features does not support the input keyword. Enter the output keyword > only." > However, later in the section "Configuring Per-Session QoS Using a RADIUS > Server" read: > cisco-avpair = "sub-qos-policy-in/out=p23" > Is it possible to do input policing via RADIUS or anyway else? Does anybody > tested this? > > WBR, > Andrey > >> -----???????? ?????????----- >> ??: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?? ????? Oliver >> Boehmer (oboehmer) >> ??????????: 10 ?????? 2008 ?. 8:58 >> ????: Gregory Boehnlein; [email protected] >> ????: Re: [c-nsp] CBWFQ-LLQ on PPPoE Virtual Templates >> >> >> QoS for L2TP users is not supported in your release, you need 12.2SB, >> take a look at the "Per-Session QoS" feature at >> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sb/feature/guide/sbbbrs1b.html >> >> >> oli >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
