Hank, You should also take into consideration the type of the NPE and its current load, as it may become a bottle neck.
Arie -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hank Nussbacher Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 17:03 PM To: Łukasz Bromirski Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1 PPS limitations On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: > For the GE ports on NPE-G1 you can expect around [EMAIL PROTECTED], for the > traffic going from/to GE port on NPE-G1 to C7200-I/O-GE it's close to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], and going from/to PA-GE it's only around [EMAIL PROTECTED] > That'll depend on features, IOS train and the traffic characteristics > of course but those are the baselines for empty config with CEF and > 12.1 train. 12.2S and latest 12.4(15)T rebuilds should get better > performance in the same scenario. > > PA-GE to PA-GE traffic maxes out at around [EMAIL PROTECTED] with NPE-G1 and > NPE-400 - so it's not limitation of CPU engine but a bus limitation. I need PA-GE to C7200-I/O-GE connectivity. For 1500 bytes, what is the kpps one can expect for PA-GE to C7200-I/O-GE connectivity? IOS train is 12.4(12) but can be upgraded if we know there is better performance at a later version. Thanks, Hank _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
