2008/11/1 Lincoln Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Karl Gaissmaier wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe RFC1213 ipForwarding would work
>>>
>>> ipForwarding OBJECT-TYPE
>>> SYNTAX INTEGER {
>>> forwarding(1), -- acting as a gateway
>>> not-forwarding(2) -- NOT acting as a gateway
>>> }
>>>
> the challenge is how to use this moving forward on Cisco platforms that have
> dedicated out-of-band management interfaces (e.g. Nexus platforms), because
> technically speaking, they ALWAYS have at L3 interface configured (mgmt0
> out-of-band) which is L3 by definition because it exists in its own
> 'management' VRF).
> its one case where the MIB falls down & is showing its age.
> in the case of Nexus, we're thinking about 'lying' in the ipForwarding
> answer to exclude 'management VRF' but even so . . .
does it mean that the value of nexus' mgmt VRF is 0 or 1 for ipForwading?
I understand that it should be 0 as it is a host, not a gateway, shouldn't it?
--
-mat
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
