Hi,
Janet Sullivan schrieb:
..
> Of course, opinions on SXH3a are also welcome, but I'm a bit untrusting
> of the SXH beast still. <grin>
my tests with SXH on a sup720-3B showed a constant higher load
of the switch processor compared to any SXF version:
Version SXF:
> cat65# remote command switch show proc cpu sort
>
> CPU utilization for five seconds: 14%/1%; one minute: 11%; five minutes: 11%
> PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
> 41 18207424 33591134 542 5.51% 6.73% 6.77% 0 slcp process
>
> 133 321528 49015 6559 4.47% 0.37% 0.16% 0 L2 MAC oob
> sync
> 101 4551988 195787 23249 1.67% 1.70% 1.68% 0 Vlan
> Statistics
Version SXH:
The slcp process is consuming always at least 20% on SXH releases on the
same box.
Remarks: The box is used as a LAN collapsed backbone router, terminating
~ 170 SVIs with about 8k MAC addresses in the LAN.
Best Regards
Charly
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
