Hi, On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 06:52:28AM -0800, Janet Sullivan wrote: > In my SXF15 experience, I actually shut down a BGP peer (good 'ol nei > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx shut), and while BGP saw the routes go away, the local > routing table on the box did not. That seems slightly different than > the ghost bug as I understood it, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
That's definitely different from the Ghost Bugs.
In the ghost bugs, at least as far as I observed, updates BGP table ->
routing table happened just fine. Only BGP withdraw messages to other
(i-)BGP peers were sometimes lost, so a route "stuck" in the other
router's BGP table.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpB6eqnk0HxU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
