The 6324 100 MM is supported but did not come online in SXI 1, 2 , 2A. It did however work in SXI, which we are running now.
The other flavors are not supported. Jeff On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > Release 12.2(33)SXH and later releases do not support the following hardware: > > These Ethernet Switching Modules: > > –WS-X6024-10FL-MT 24-port 10BASE-FL MT-RJ > > –WS-X6248A-TEL 48-port 10/100TX RJ-21 > > –WS-X6248-RJ-45 48-port 10/100TX RJ-45 > > –WS-X6248-TEL 48-port 10/100TX RJ-21 > > –WS-X6324-100FX-SM 24-port 100FX Ethernet > > –WS-X6224-100FX-MT 24-port 100FX Ethernet Multimode MT-RJ > > –WS-X6316-GE-TX 16-port Gigabit Ethernet RJ-45 > > –WS-X6416-GE-MT 16-Port Gigabit Ethernet MT-RJ > > Now, the caveat is that they did not actually remove the hardware > support for some of these until SXI1, so while the release notes say one > thing, the actual support varies. > > You will see something like this in 'show power': > 4 WS-X6248A-TEL 112.98 2.69 - - on off (not > supported) > 8 WS-X6248-RJ-45 112.98 2.69 - - on off (not > supported) > > It does appear the WS-X6324-100FX-MM card does power on for SXI3, but I can't > recall if that was the case for SXI2/2a/or 1. > > - Jared > > On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Chris Phillips wrote: > >> Jared, >> >> After quickly glancing at the release notes, I was unable to find anything >> about the removal of hardware support for the 63xx series cards. Do you >> have a URL or can you be more specific? >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Jared Mauch wrote: >>> SXI3 has a number of bug fixes for our network, including one that would >>> cause the next-hop to be populated as 'drop' in hardware. >>> I strongly recommend using it over prior versions of SXI. >>> Due to the removal of hardware support we replaced the older 63xx/62xx >>> series cards. >>> - Jared >>> On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: >>>> SXI2a running fine with MPLS, QoS, SVIs (no BFD on those... :-(), >>>> OSPF, BGP. PFC3C-only, no WAN cards/modules, no DFC. >>>> >>>> >>>> Rubens >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jeff Fitzwater <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> I have been running the SXI(3) on a test router with 100M MM 6324, which >>>>> it did not recognize in previous versions, and so far no complaints but >>>>> then again it's not in a real world yet. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone else have GOOD or BAD new on SXI(3)? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jeff Fitzwater >>>>> OIT Network Systems >>>>> Princeton University >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
