Here is some BAD on SXI3 ... with redundant supervisor, SSH breaks upon supervisor switchover.
-andrew On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Jeff Fitzwater <[email protected]> wrote: > The 6324 100 MM is supported but did not come online in SXI 1, 2 , 2A. It did > however work in SXI, which we are running now. > > The other flavors are not supported. > > Jeff > > On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > >> Release 12.2(33)SXH and later releases do not support the following hardware: >> >> These Ethernet Switching Modules: >> >> –WS-X6024-10FL-MT 24-port 10BASE-FL MT-RJ >> >> –WS-X6248A-TEL 48-port 10/100TX RJ-21 >> >> –WS-X6248-RJ-45 48-port 10/100TX RJ-45 >> >> –WS-X6248-TEL 48-port 10/100TX RJ-21 >> >> –WS-X6324-100FX-SM 24-port 100FX Ethernet >> >> –WS-X6224-100FX-MT 24-port 100FX Ethernet Multimode MT-RJ >> >> –WS-X6316-GE-TX 16-port Gigabit Ethernet RJ-45 >> >> –WS-X6416-GE-MT 16-Port Gigabit Ethernet MT-RJ >> >> Now, the caveat is that they did not actually remove the hardware >> support for some of these until SXI1, so while the release notes say one >> thing, the actual support varies. >> >> You will see something like this in 'show power': >> 4 WS-X6248A-TEL 112.98 2.69 - - on off (not >> supported) >> 8 WS-X6248-RJ-45 112.98 2.69 - - on off (not >> supported) >> >> It does appear the WS-X6324-100FX-MM card does power on for SXI3, but I >> can't recall if that was the case for SXI2/2a/or 1. >> >> - Jared >> >> On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Chris Phillips wrote: >> >>> Jared, >>> >>> After quickly glancing at the release notes, I was unable to find anything >>> about the removal of hardware support for the 63xx series cards. Do you >>> have a URL or can you be more specific? >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> Jared Mauch wrote: >>>> SXI3 has a number of bug fixes for our network, including one that would >>>> cause the next-hop to be populated as 'drop' in hardware. >>>> I strongly recommend using it over prior versions of SXI. >>>> Due to the removal of hardware support we replaced the older 63xx/62xx >>>> series cards. >>>> - Jared >>>> On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: >>>>> SXI2a running fine with MPLS, QoS, SVIs (no BFD on those... :-(), >>>>> OSPF, BGP. PFC3C-only, no WAN cards/modules, no DFC. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rubens >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jeff Fitzwater <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I have been running the SXI(3) on a test router with 100M MM 6324, which >>>>>> it did not recognize in previous versions, and so far no complaints but >>>>>> then again it's not in a real world yet. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone else have GOOD or BAD new on SXI(3)? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jeff Fitzwater >>>>>> OIT Network Systems >>>>>> Princeton University >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > -- -andrew _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
