Hi, On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:04:09PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 21 Sep 2012, at 18:06, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > > (Stupid move. Even more stupid, still the same with vtp v3 > > The cynic in me wonders what you expect if you use vtp? :-) > > Nick, > ex-vtp user, blood-stained t shirt and all
Sure, same thing here :-)
I wouldn't let VTP near anything important, but I have a couple of
switches that actually MUST have identical VLANs (specifically, blade
center switches that feed ESX clusters), and VTP3 with passwords and
stuff looked promising.
Then I noticed that it kills the concept of "backup and revision-control
what's on the devices", and abandoned the thought again.
Someone in IOS development really need to work outside their closed
cubicles for a while...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpPACvLCwPUS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
