On (2012-10-26 13:50 -0400), Jason Lixfeld wrote: > Service instances are Cisco's 2012 way of doing subinterfaces:
Which is utterly inexcusable, just because you support some new things in the backend, does not mean you should expose completely new abstraction model to the frontend. What you configure in EVC should be configurable just as well in subinterface. With the difference that your existing config parsers would work and your existing SNMP graphing would work etc. I'm not even proponent of backward compatibility, if some benefits can be gained by making things in a new way, I'm all for breaking stuff. But if there is some benefit at all in EVC, I've not yet seen it, and I'd love to be corrected. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
