Hi Nicolas ,

Have you been able to figure this out please?
The configuration seems perfectly valid, one think that’s not clear to me is if 
both services are between the same ASR and ISR routers why the PW neighbor IP 
address is different on each: 2.2.2.2 vs 81.23.32.79.

adam

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nicolas KARP
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:52 PM
To: Vitkovský Adam
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR 1K : EFP / XCONNECT / BDI

Hi Adam, all,

I have now an issue when i configure a second xconnect under an efp. The idea 
is to create several xconnect between an ASR and a ISR 2801 to xconnect some 
vlans between the 2 platforms. As soon as I configure the 2nd xconnect and as 
soon as it comes UP, the trafic associated with the EVC is not going through.. 
In fact, all EVC under the interface g0/0/4 stop working...



  BDI4096
  BDI4093
ASR 1001x <---- xconnect MPLS ---> 2801
    |                                                     |
    |                                                     |
  switch                                           switch
vlan 4094                                     vlan 4094
vlan 4093                                     vlan 4093
vlan 4092                                     vlan 4092


Here is the config of the 1001x :


interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
 mtu 1530
 no ip address
 load-interval 30
 negotiation auto
 service instance 4092 ethernet
 encapsulation dot1q 4092 exact
  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
  xconnect 2.2.2.2 12 encapsulation mpls
!
 service instance 4093 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 4093 exact
  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
  bridge-domain 4093
 !
 service instance 4094 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 4094
  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
  bridge-domain 4096
 !
end


l2 vfi TEST2 manual (it's working when the service instance 4092 is not 
configured)
 vpn id 258
 bridge-domain 4093
 mtu 1530
 neighbor 81.23.32.79 11 encapsulation mpls
!

interface BDI4093
 mtu 1530
 ip vrf forwarding TEST2
 ip address 172.31.0.253 255.255.255.0
 standby 1 ip 172.31.0.254
 standby 1 priority 110
 standby 1 preempt delay minimum 60
end


interface BDI4096
 ip vrf forwarding TEST
 ip address 10.84.6.2 255.255.255.0
 standby 1 ip 10.84.6.1
 standby 1 priority 110
 standby 1 preempt delay minimum 60
end


and the config on the 2801 :


interface FastEthernet0/1.4092
 encapsulation dot1Q 4092
 no cdp enable
 xconnect 1.1.1.1 12 encapsulation mpls
end

interface FastEthernet0/1.4093
 encapsulation dot1Q 4093
 no cdp enable
 xconnect 1.1.1.1 11 encapsulation mpls
end





bridge domain when it works :

RTI-MPLS-SAB-01#show bridge-domain 4093
Bridge-domain 4093 (3 ports in all)
State: UP                    Mac learning: Enabled
Aging-Timer: 300 second(s)
    BDI4093  (up)
    GigabitEthernet0/0/4 service instance 4093
    vfi OCTEY neighbor 81.23.32.79 11
   AED MAC address    Policy  Tag       Age  Pseudoport
   0   0024.E84F.9A87 forward dynamic   292  GigabitEthernet0/0/4.EFP4093
   -   881D.FCD4.293F to_bdi  static    0    BDI4093
   0   0022.195F.166B forward dynamic   279  GigabitEthernet0/0/4.EFP4093
   1   FFFF.FFFF.FFFF flood   static    0    OLIST_PTR:0x2edad820
   -   0000.0C07.AC01 to_bdi  static    0    BDI4093
   0   001B.213F.EDA8 forward dynamic   286  GigabitEthernet0/0/4.EFP4093


and when there is an issue :


RTI-MPLS-SAB-01#show  bridge-domain 4096
Bridge-domain 4096 (2 ports in all)
State: UP                    Mac learning: Enabled
Aging-Timer: 300 second(s)
    BDI4096  (up)
    GigabitEthernet0/0/4 service instance 4094
   AED MAC address    Policy  Tag       Age  Pseudoport
   -   881D.FCD4.293F to_bdi  static    0    BDI4096
   1   FFFF.FFFF.FFFF flood   static    0    OLIST_PTR:0x2edad810
   -   0000.0C07.AC01 to_bdi  static    0    BDI4096


The mac address of the switch behind the ASR disappeared... Not too sure why... 
If i remove the xconnect under the service instance 4092, it still doesn't 
work. I have to remove the xconnect and do a shut/no shut on the physical 
port...


Do you know what is happening ?

Thank you.


# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# - -   Nicolas KARP
# - -   Network and Security Engineer
# - -    Email : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
# - -    Linkedin :  http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolaskarp
# - -    Viadeo : http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp 
<http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp%20>
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


2014-12-03 15:54 GMT+01:00 Nicolas KARP <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
That's the point !! I modified the mtu under the bdi interface and i had to 
modify the mu under the l2 vfi interface in order to get it funtionnal.

Thanks for the help.

# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# - -   Nicolas KARP
# - -   Network and Security Engineer
# - -    Email : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
# - -    Linkedin :  http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolaskarp
# - -    Viadeo : http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp 
<http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp%20>
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


2014-12-03 13:13 GMT+01:00 Vitkovský Adam 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Does the MTU match on both ends please?
You can see the MTU on both ends in the output of the cmd “sh mpls l2 vc det”

adam

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Nicolas KARP
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 12:29 PM
To: Vitkovský Adam
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR 1K : EFP / XCONNECT / BDI

I've found another thread where you were talking about router pw on an ASR1k.

He is the config i've done so far :

ASR 1001X :

l2 vfi TEST2 manual
 vpn id 258
 bridge-domain 4093
 neighbor 2.2.2.2 11 encapsulation mpls

interface BDI4093
 mtu 1530
 ip vrf forwarding TEST2
 ip address 172.31.0.253 255.255.255.0
 standby 1 ip 172.31.0.254
 standby 1 priority 110
 standby 1 preempt delay minimum 60
end

interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
 no ip address
 load-interval 30
 negotiation auto
 service instance 4093 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 4093 exact
  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
  bridge-domain 4093
 !


ISR 2801 :

interface FastEthernet0/1.4093
 encapsulation dot1Q 4093
 no cdp enable
 xconnect 1.1.1.1 11 encapsulation mpls


//

For some reason the xconnect is not coming up...


RTI-MPLS-SAB-01#sh xconnect all
DN pri  vfi OCTEY                        UP mpls 2.2.2.2:11<http://2.2.2.2:11>  
             DN
UP pri   bd 4093                         UP  vfi TEST2                        UP


Thanks for your help.


# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# - -   Nicolas KARP
# - -   Network and Security Engineer
# - -    Email : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
# - -    Linkedin :  http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolaskarp
# - -    Viadeo : http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp 
<http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp%20>
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2014-12-03 11:14 GMT+01:00 Nicolas KARP <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Hi Adam,

I don't have the xconnect command under the bdi interface :

RTI-MPLS-SAB-01(config)#interface BDI4093
RTI-MPLS-SAB-01(config-if)#xconnect ?
% Unrecognized command

I'm using ASR1001X , ves 03.13.01.S


Any thought ?



# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# - -   Nicolas KARP
# - -   Network and Security Engineer
# - -    Email : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
# - -    Linkedin :  http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolaskarp
# - -    Viadeo : http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp 
<http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp%20>
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2014-12-03 10:21 GMT+01:00 Vitkovský Adam 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Hi Nicolas,

This is the config for mixing EFPs and PWs in a common BD + IP interface for 
the BD.
Manual hub and spoke type of configuration with IP address + VFR at the hub 
location.

interface TenGigabitEthernet0/3
 mtu 9000
 service instance 8000 ethernet
  description CUSTOMER-B
  encapsulation dot1q 20,30,40
  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
  bridge-domain 8000

interface BDI8000
 mtu 9000
 vrf CUST-B
 ip add 192.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
 xconnect vfi CUST-B-BD

l2 vfi CUST-B-BD manual
 vpn id 1
 neighbor 10.0.1.3 100 encapsulation mpls
 neighbor 10.0.1.4 200 encapsulation mpls
 neighbor 10.0.1.5 300 encapsulation mpls

Spokes would have just EFPs with xconnect.


adam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp 
> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
>  On Behalf Of
> Nicolas KARP
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 6:03 PM
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: [c-nsp] ASR 1K : EFP / XCONNECT / BDI
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to interconnect 2 platforms on 2 different datacenters.
>
> The idea is to create several EFPs on each PE (one at each side) and create a
> default xconnect pw in order to encapsulate the layer2 traffic over our MPLS
> network. I also have some layer 3 interfaces for different vlans which need to
> be used on both datacenters :
>
>
> *PE1 : (same config on PE2, except for the BDI interface)*
>
>
> *interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4*
> * no ip address*
> * load-interval 30*
> * negotiation auto*
>
> *## default XCONNECT to DC2*
> * service instance 1 ethernet*
> *  encapsulation default*
> *  xconnect 1.1.1.1 9999 encapsulation mpls pw-class EOMPLS-ETH-TO-VLAN*
> * !*
>
> *## Layer 3 interface via BDI*
> * service instance 4093 ethernet*
> *  encapsulation dot1q 4093 exact*
> *  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric*
> *  bridge-domain 4093*
> * !*
>
> *interface BDI4093*
> * ip vrf forwarding TEST2*
> * ip address 172.31.0.253 255.255.255.0*
> * standby 1 ip 172.31.0.254*
> * standby 1 priority 110*
> * standby 1 preempt delay minimum 60*
> *end*
>
> *--> I'm missing a xconnect for the vlan 4093...*
>
>
> How can I create a layer3 interface and run a xconnect on the same EFP ?
> The idea would be to use the same vlans at both locations and terminate the
> Layer3 on a BDI interface in Datacenter1.
>
> Do you think it's possible ?
> I'm not too sure if i'm really clear. Don't hesitate to ask me if you have any
> questions :)
>
> Many Thanks for your help !
>
> # - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> # - -   Nicolas KARP
> # - -   Network and Security Engineer
> # - -    Email : [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> # - -    Linkedin :  http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolaskarp
> # - -    Viadeo : http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp
> <http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp%20>
> # - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to