Are all of the acls the same on both boxes? It almost sounds like one box had a tcam explosion due to differing ACLs.
Mack McBride | Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc. O: 720.891.2502 | [email protected] | www.viawest.com | LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeroen van Ingen Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 9:34 AM To: Łukasz Bromirski Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] One Cat6k/Sup2T is software switching, its identical partner is not Hi Łukasz, >> We have two Cat6k's with Sup2T in our network, both running IOS 15.1(1)SY3. > > Are they really identical, down to Sw/Hw revisions and ROMMON > versions? You got me there. PFC4 versions differ: the one doing everything in hw has hw rev 2.0, the one partially software switching currently has a PFC4 hw v1.1 and previous sup had PFC4 hw 1.6 iirc. Line cards do have the same HW rev and ROMMON versions are identical too. I mentioned this to TAC but the response was that that couldn't be related. My question about what sort of changes were made or could have been made in those revisions wasn't answered though. Did you ever hear details about differences in hw revisions? > It seems that something on the device side either interprets the > configuration in different order and this hits some rare bug, or > there’s something other at the software/hardware border that you’re > hitting. Yeah, that was what I thought. Guess there's not much more to do than hope that our TAC case will eventually go to the right people. I heard it's on its way to the Cat6k BU and a friendly TME + our account managers are now tracking the case, so hopefully we'll see some progress next week. Thanks, Jeroen van Ingen ICT Service Centre University of Twente, P.O.Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected by law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Unless you are the addressee or authorized agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained within. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by electronic reply and immediately delete all copies of the message. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
