Its odd that they seem to only have 1M IPV4 routes in the 6800/6500 and the N7k but not the N9K.
Im guessing they expect everyone to route with ASRs and switch with N9Ks -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 4:23 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cat 6800 performance mode On 16/12/15 19:17, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:45:07PM +0000, Drew Weaver wrote: >> Speaking of the 6800 does anyone know if they are still planning on >> releasing the 10T version of the Supervisor that was promised back when this >> product was announced? >> >> Without that there seems no reason for this product to exist vs an 8 slot >> nexus. > > You have much to learn about Cisco BU politics... > > (Hint: Nexus is like a totally separate company, with separate > products, Early on in the lifetime of the N7k M1 linecards, I heard a rumor from a usually-reliable source that the Nexus BU had beaten the c6500 one to the front of the queue for EARL8 and supporting hardware (which the M1 was built on), which accounted for the early lack of availability of sup2T PFC4/DFC4. Even if it's not true, the existence of the rumor is a good illustration of the harm that these kinds of internal competition can cause to customers. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
