On 17/12/15 14:32, Drew Weaver wrote:
Its odd that they seem to only have 1M IPV4 routes in the 6800/6500 and the N7k but not the N9K.
Well, the N9k is largely merchant silicon (remember when Cisco said that was bad? It's good now apparently...) whereas the 68/6500 and N7k are Cisco ASICs (EARL7/8). From what I've seen - though I don't claim expertise - the merchant devices tend to have tiny tables by comparison.
Certainly some of the N9k and other bcm-based platforms have too-low numbers of adjacencies, sub-/64 v6 routes and similar, for me to feel comfortable with.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
