>>>Really, this is not about any particular situation, just want some
thoughts.  A cavalier tests heart clear via cardiologist auscultation at age
5.  Obviously we all agree it is OK to breed this cavalier per the
guidelines.  What would you do if when you test the dog when it is 6 or 7and
it has a Grade 3 or 4 murmur , per auscultation?  Would you stop breeding
that cavalier?  Would it make a difference if it were a male or female?
Everybody talks about looking for lines with long-lived dogs.  Are those
long-lived dogs living long with a mild murmur?  thoughts?.....

I don't breed like this--period.  I consider MVD the most *serious* issue
with Cavaliers and it is treated as such.  The *dog* in question should not
be the only dog you are thinking about.  Again, this is breeding
phenotypically, and if there is any other way, I would NOT breed a dog that
was only phenotypically clear at age 5.  Especially one that progressed what
I consider *quickly*.

In my 26 years of breeding, even though every single Cavalier is different
in how they express MVD, in my opinion I believe I am seeing only 3
*distinct* types of MVD. (1) Cavalier develops MVD early (age 6 or earlier)
and progresses quickly (grade 3 or higher within 2 years) and usually but
not always is dead earlier than average.  (2) Cavalier develops MVD at age 3
through age 6 and progresses slowly--is still grade 1, maybe 2, past age 7
or 8 and lives a normal lifespan (re MVD only).  (3) Cavalier develops MVD
age 7 or later and progresses slowly.  I categorize those that never develop
MVD in the last category as there are so few that were cardiologist cleared
every year throughout their lives and because there are just a handful of
Cavaliers that fit into this category.  Then there is a separate
classification that I'm not sure just how to categorize--those that remain
completely MVD clear then suddenly chordae tendinae *blow out* the one side
of the valve literally overnight often resulting in the dog dying almost
instantly--but sometimes with careful monitoring they go on to live for
years (if both sides blow out I think there is no chance for that dog
although I'm sure there have been exceptions!).

In my opinion of Cavaliers at this point in time, I consider early onset
before age 4, average onset at age 4-6, and late onset at age 7 or later.  I
base this on generalizing all the studies that have been done to
date-realizing how few dogs were checked and therefore rationalizing an
approximate guess of what the real statistics would turn out to be should
every Cavalier be auscultated yearly--and decided that it is somewhat likely
that generally and very approximately about 25% of Cavaliers will develop
MVD before age 4 and generally about 25% of Cavaliers won't develop MVD till
age 7 or later, with approx. 50% of them developing MVD between 4 and 6
years of age.   I try to focus on dogs with late onset or dogs with some
late onset history and little negative history of early or average onset.  I
would also consider a dog with average onset who still had a grade 1 or 2
murmur at age 9 or 10--especially if I had good history information.

Of course there are exceptions to these categories, but then again I'm not
so sure there are *many* exceptions.  I think it is entirely possible that
due to human inadequacies and the fact that murmur status can change from
day to day that many murmurs are missed at a *younger* age.  Using doppler
would tend to erase many of these questions, but few breeders have the money
or ability to doppler every dog.  I believe age 5 is just an arbitrary
number.  Yes, Cavaliers clear at age 5 are in the upper 50th percentile, but
still just because a dog is supposedly auscultated clear right at age 5,
doesn't necessarily mean that much.  Maybe the dog was checked shortly after
age 5. Maybe just a month later (still age 5) the dog already had developed
MVD to the extent that it could be heard--but few of us have our dogs
aucultated more than once a year.  Maybe the cardiologist had a cold or
sinus infection and wasn't hearing quite as well that day and the dog did
have a grade 1 murmur.  Maybe the dog had an audible murmur the month before
but on that day for whatever reason the murmur was inaudible.  Many too many
possibilities that could have gone into this supposedly clear evaluation.
The fact that the dog is progressing quickly should be cause to rethink.
History is needed.

Why would one only look at that particular dog anyway?  Isn't there some way
to get history on that dog?  What about the dog's parents?  Were they
cardiologist evaluated yearly?  What was their status?  How about the dog's
relatives:  siblings, aunts, uncles, grandparents?   Isn't some other
information available to you so you could make a better decision?  Do you
know honest cardiologist or longevity history--not heresay?

One of the reasons I bought my Finley was because of his MVD
*history*--besides his other attributes of course.  His two granddads are
Alberto and Kasanova.   I do have important pieces of information about
those dogs.  I know Alberto lived to be 15 and Kasanova was cardiologist
clear at 9 and at the time of his death.  At the time of Finley's birth I
knew Alberto was 11 and had cardiologist clear offspring at age 8, 9 and 10
in the U.S. and I knew the clear cardiologist status of Kasanova.  I feel
*better* having this information and feel fairly safe in breeding to
Finley--but still worry a little--despite the fact that he has a 3/4 brother
who was clear at 8 and is probably still clear, despite the fact that he
recently dopplered clear.   I'm hesitant about using any male at stud unless
it is either 7 years of age or older and still MVD clear, but I do use those
that I do have good information about MVD history--both parents (or the
grandparents) being clear to age 7 or more or alive past age 10.  I don't
want to hear poor MVD information about more than one of the six immediate
ancestors--parents or grandparents.  Since the males tend to develop MVD at
very slightly younger ages, an older clear male is more significant than an
older clear female. Therefore I put slightly more importance on the male
parent or male grandparents being clear at 7 than I do on the females. Of
course, due to secrecy, it is hard to get this information, but I try.  If I
get poor MVD information on one ancestor and can't get any good MVD
information--I will pass.    In most cases enough information is available
that I can hazard a very general and approximate guess of what that dog's
genotype might be for MVD.  And make a better decision on whether or not to
breed to that dog.  Don't think just dog--think history.

I think anyone could understand why I would not use the dog you referred to.

Laura Lang
Roycroft Cavaliers

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

Reply via email to