Jeanie,

Please don't feel stomped on; disagreement is not personal.  I only make
additions because there may be new people on the list and I don't want them
to misunderstand.  I made the comment about the iris because Laura referred
to it -- it had nothing to do with your post..

But re the " I wasn't referring to the nictating membrane " comment (your
post), I need to clarify for the others:  The nictating membrane is the haw
is the third eyelid.  Those three terms all mean one and the same.   It may
be clear or pigmented.  The sclera (white of the eye) with its overlying
conjunctiva can also be white or dark.  (but almost always dark in
wholecolors).

>From the boxer guy, geneticist Bruce Cattanach (UK not American),
"I think everyone would accept that traditionally solid breeds, such as
Labradors, do not have white or unpigmented haws. Neither do such breeds
typically have substantial white chest markings, and seldom too do they have
white toes. In most solid breeds, such markings are heavily penalised in the
show ring.  So Boxer solids, tend to be overmarked genetic solids, both for
body markings and for third eyelid (haw) pigmentation."


Leanne

----- Original Message -----



> Hi Kim
> You write
> <<.however, the term double
> pigment has been used in the states as long as I have been showing dogs
> here and I k>>>>.
> Well it must be one of those "American " things then! LOL   I have
certainly
> never heard the term used by any of the Cavalier people who taught me
about
> the breed, Susan Burgess, Gertie Biddle, Pam Turle and others. from your
> description, we are talking about the same thing  so I describe that as
the
> surrounding ring being "pigmented".
>
> Leanne <<< (nothing to do with the iris)>>
> I know its nothing to do with the iris - I said <<<<r the area surrounding
> the iris is pigm>>>>>>
> I was referring to the sclera. I wasn't referring to the nictating
> membrane - that's the one the German Boxer judges get in such a swizz
about
> if it is unpigmented! Grin  I don't think your dog can be graded
> "excellent" unless it is pigmented.
>
> Thank you Nancy for speaking up - I was beginning to feel decidedly
"stomped
> on" .  For those of you who think I was "nit picking",  I was simply
saying
> that it was not a term which I had heard in conjunction with the breed by
> the breed greats who taught me. And I happen to think traditions  - such
as
> standing to show the dog LOL - are important. Harry Spira's book  is
really
> wonderful - he was my own vet  many years ago and a visit to the surgery
> always ended up being extended as the discussion would inevitably digress
> into judging dogs and different breeds.
>
> Cheers
> Jeanie

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

Reply via email to