> I, for one, remain optimistic that the CKCSC, USA membership will vote to > allow AKC only dogs. I have yet to hear one valid, realistic argument > against it. I can't be the only one that feels that way.
I feel totally optimistic about it too. Non-breeders may lack experience breeding, but they do not lack for intelligence. If they get real factual information about the 3 issues I discussed yesterday and not generalized misconstrued statements--they will vote to resolve this issue. They will understand completely that it is for the betterment of the breed. Dog World published a wonderful article last August, September, October and November--a 4 part series on Canines and Humans/Disease/Genetic Diversity. If we get permission to use some of this information, it will go a long ways towards helping non-breeders realize what breeders are up against and how VERY important it is to increase our gene pool as much as possible. They will realize once and for all that this division is a terrible detriment to the health of the breed. Laura Lang ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
