Yes, but Pat, you are not a puppy pyramider. They sell every bitch puppy on several puppies, even entire litters, back. That is what I was talking about, not breeders who co-own. I would co-own myself under the right set of circumstances, but I wouldn't ever ask for a puppy back under any circumstances. Myra
>From: Harry & Pat Barrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: The Cavalier King Charles Spaniel List ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [CKCS-L] Reasons for Co-Own >Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:04:15 +0200 > >Glenn wrote: "And not one breeder did I come across that didn't also want >to co-own. However, that did not alarm me too much because I figured if >they wanted their name on the dog then they must be pretty confident that's >it's a good representative of their line." > >Myra wrote: "In a lot of cases, Glenn...the breeder wants their name on >the puppy no matter what it's quality is, so they get puppies back from >you. The puppy pyramiders don't really care all that much about quality; >only quantity." > >At the time a co-ownership is arranged, I would think that the reasons >would be spelled out. In Canada, whoever breeds a litter has their kennel >name as the first portion of the registered name. If another breeder >purchases that puppy prior to individual registration and has their own >kennel name, then the option is available to also put their kennel name >into the registered name. Maximum length of the name is 30 characters, >including spaces and punctuation. Is it different in the U.S. or >elsewhere? > >My main reason to co-own a puppy I produced would be to ensure that no >breeding happened that I was not in favour of. This helps to ensure your >input; otherwise, without your signature on the Application for >Registration of a Litter, the resulting puppies would not be registerable. >Co-ownership agreements also serve as a safety net. IF I were placing a >show prospect puppy with a relative newcomer/inexperienced breeder, I would >always do a co-ownership for that reason. The other conditions of such a >partnership are dependant upon the individual circumstances. Another good >reason for co-ownership is to ensure your particular standards of health >testing, showing prior to a breeding. It is always an option to fully >transfer the puppy/adult to the name of the buyer once your mutually agreed >upon conditions have been met. Co-owns are not only about money, puppies >back, or advertising. I share this as general info and not specifically >addressed to Myra and Glenn or the those "in the know" :) > > >Pat Barrington - Barrington Cavaliers (Southern Ontario-Canada) >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >========================================================= >"Magic Commands": >to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL >to start it up gain click here: >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL > > E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. >Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html > >All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author. Myra Savant Gardengate Cavaliers _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
