Yes. That's in my mind reasonable but not mandatory. Of course I'm very sure many would criticize the tester and the tests.. Jo Ann
> In a message dated 8/21/2002 9:13:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > I'm not against testing. > > I'm against being told who I go to for my tests. > > When I must test. > > What I must test for. > > > > What if you could go to whomever you wanted test when you wanted and test for > what you wanted. But whenever you registered a litter the paperwork would > ask you to submit all tests performed on sire and dam and it would be > published in a public forum? If you do not provide one of the listed tests > it is published as not provided. You would have every opportunity to make > your own decisions and answer any questions as to what you provided or did > not from anyone who chose to inquire with you in any manner you wished. > There would be no re-purcussions through legislation in the club for anything > you did or did not provide. It would just be public and easily accessable to > everyone. What about that? Could that be a starting point? > > Dave > CastleMyst Cavaliers > http://members.aol.com/CMystCavs ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
