On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Luís Oliveira <luis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Simon Ortiz <o.si...@gmail.com> wrote: >> For our first approach, I'll do a cl-opengl-es-1.1 system which will >> depend on cl-opengl as is. I'll write the CFFI definitions for the >> egl* functions by hand. I guess I'll define the fixed-point data type >> by hand too. >> > Yes, that's my suggestion.
If I understand correctly, EGL is something like glx/wgl/etc, and isn't actually part of OpenGL ES itself, so I'd probably lean towards a separate cl-egl system containing just the EGL parts. If ES 1.x only adds data types, I'd probably include them in the main cl-opengl for now. If there are conflicting function signatures or enums things would be more complicated... not sure what the best solution for that would be. -b- _______________________________________________ cl-opengl-devel mailing list cl-opengl-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-opengl-devel
