Artur Biesiadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe kaffe could be used instead ? It is a lot more stable, faster,
> has free java library that can be used to fill gaps (in other case
> we need to fill gaps with JDK classlib).
One of the great benefits of using Japhar is that we're making it more
stable. Unlike using Sun's classes.zip, when we find a bug, we can
easily track down the part of Japhar that's broken and implement a fix
(or just bug toshok to fix it). The fact that Japhar is slower than
Kaffe is a non-issue. Japhar does work.
We plan to eventually support Kaffe, but I don't see a need to make
that our primary testing/release platform. Transvirtual has been
generally uncooperative regarding overlap of work between their class
libraries and ours. Except for the AWT, we have much more
functionality that their class libraries.
--
Paul Fisher * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
