My belief is that this registry key check references the wrong hive. I've seen Microsoft documentation that says this key is in HKLM, not HKCU. However, I don't have a 64-bit Vista system to test this on, but it might be worth someone who does looking into it
Regards Max > -----Original Message----- > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce A. Locke > Sent: 30 January 2008 03:07 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [CLEANACCESS] CCAA running Checks? > > Joey Mavity wrote: > > > > According to Cisco documentation at > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/nac/appliance/support > _guide/srvrhw.html, > > Clean Access only supports authentication on 64-bit OS Windows. > > > > > > > > Yet I have a Windows Vista Home Premium 64 machine failing on: > > > > > > > > Failed Checks: > > pc_vista64, Registry Check > [\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Wow6432Node\ > > exists ] > > pc_KB941644_1_MS08-001_Vista, File Check [$SYSTEM_32\tcpipcfg.dll > > later than [C]01/07/2008 00:00:00] > > > > From my understanding the pc_vista64 check is OR'd with a batch of > other patches so it will always show up in the failed checks list of > vista 32-bit systems. The culprit here is the pc_KB941644 > patch. Good > luck with Vista patches, sometimes you can't do anything to > get windows > to update that file date even when you uninstall and > reinstall the patch > several times... We have at least 15 exceptions due to > various systems > and vista patches that simply won't update the file date. > > -- > > Bruce A. Locke > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > HAB 50 - (845) 257-3809 > > Network Administrator > Computer Services > State University of New York at New Paltz >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
