>From what I've seen, that check shows up on all 32-bit clients regardless of the actually processor capabilities.
Michael Stanclift Network Analyst Rockhurst University Conway Hall, Office 415 1100 Rockhurst Road Kansas City, Missouri 64110 (816) 501-4231 From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W. (NS) Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CCAA running Checks? Looking at the checks that passed / failed, this is Vista 32-bit. Apparently it is on a 64-bit machine, though. (Note that pc_vista64 failed.) From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Xu Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 11:11 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [CLEANACCESS] CCAA running Checks? >From what I have seen, the Vista 64 bit users would show in the online users list, but do not show in the reports. Am I wrong? Did you see the Vista 64 bit failed checks in the reports? Dennis Xu Network Analyst(CCS) University of Guelph 5198244120 x 56217 From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joey Mavity Sent: January-29-08 2:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: CCAA running Checks? According to Cisco documentation at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/nac/appliance/support_guide/srv rhw.html, Clean Access only supports authentication on 64-bit OS Windows. Yet I have a Windows Vista Home Premium 64 machine failing on: Failed Checks: pc_vista64, Registry Check [\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Wow6432Node\ exists ] pc_KB941644_1_MS08-001_Vista, File Check [$SYSTEM_32\tcpipcfg.dll later than [C]01/07/2008 00:00:00] Any idea why this is happening? --Joey Mavity Azusa Pacific University
